Great, now when I watch
The Sixth Sense decades after it came out, I'm going to spend the whole time trying to figure out what the twist is. I wonder what an alternative universe M. Night Shyamalan would have been like if that film hadn't been as successful. Are films like
The Village and
The Happening, his obsession with the "twist" ending, a pavlovian response to the critical and commercial success of
The Sixth Sense; or was his lack of growth as a filmmaker inevitable, and the quality of
The Sixth Sense nothing more than a happy coincidence.
As far as film adaptations of books, Volker Schloendorf is the filmmaker
par excellence. Clearly he's making a different kind of film than those being discussed in this thread, and that's really the heart of the matter. Schloendorf films capture the spirit, feeling, and intention of a work, that's all we can expect of an adaptation; films like
The Hobbit are made for wider audiences and, as such, their 'fidelity' to the source material is assessed in a more middle-of-the-road way. I also don't understand this demand that a film have one to one parity in terms of events, descriptions, chronology, etc... before it can be considered a 'good' adaptation. Film is a different medium, if you carry over every single word from page to screen, even something as loose, lively, and lithe as
Discworld becomes plodding, clumsy, pompous.