outlaw
- #1
This is my idea. Right now the tank is full of 20Gal worth of water. It has cycled water, gravel and filter on it.

My wife wants to get a frog or two and I still want more fish...what better way to have both and save the space another tank would've taken(no room for another atm). I would use the HOB that I have on there now, and rig up some tubing to it to extend to the edges of the "land" for the intake. I am thinking with what I read(very little so far) on frogs that they kind of "coat" everthing, I would try to do a skimmer(line going to surface in "Front" view) to help keep the water surface clean. I would have a total of 4 intakes(suction power permitting). The filter is rated at 118GPH, which I figure should be sufficient since I don't plan on having the tank near full. Probably about half or so, and even then, I could always seal off around the land so the water doesn't get into the empty cavity...or let it and let the fish go back there? The water would go down a waterfall/river type effect back to the water as seen in the top and part of the front view. It would empty back into the water in the middle of the intakes to try and create a flow from the middle out to the sides where the intakes are.
What do you guys think so far? Any ideas and criticism welcome
Thanks in advance!

My wife wants to get a frog or two and I still want more fish...what better way to have both and save the space another tank would've taken(no room for another atm). I would use the HOB that I have on there now, and rig up some tubing to it to extend to the edges of the "land" for the intake. I am thinking with what I read(very little so far) on frogs that they kind of "coat" everthing, I would try to do a skimmer(line going to surface in "Front" view) to help keep the water surface clean. I would have a total of 4 intakes(suction power permitting). The filter is rated at 118GPH, which I figure should be sufficient since I don't plan on having the tank near full. Probably about half or so, and even then, I could always seal off around the land so the water doesn't get into the empty cavity...or let it and let the fish go back there? The water would go down a waterfall/river type effect back to the water as seen in the top and part of the front view. It would empty back into the water in the middle of the intakes to try and create a flow from the middle out to the sides where the intakes are.
What do you guys think so far? Any ideas and criticism welcome
Thanks in advance!