uncle fishy
- #1
I added some tanks recently and therefore got the Python out of storage where it had been for several years. Has anybody else noticed that Python water changers are not compatible with a large percentage of "modern" faucets? And the good folks at Python offer no solutions?
I've had my Python for at least 25 years at 6 different addresses (It is obviously very durable and a great value. Thanks, Python!) and I've never had a problem until now. I have 4 indoor faucets at my current address - 1 kitchen and 3 bathrooms - and it will not adapt to ANY OF THEM. They are all very different models too. The kitchen has a telescoping spray wand that completely prevents any adapter of any kind. The bathrooms' aerators are 100% plastic; 2 of the 3 aerators are completely recessed; all 3, though completely different, are TINY and have unusual threads; and 2 have an O-ring seal around the perimeter instead of the trusted old flat rubber gasket at the base or tapered threads. Compounding things further is the fact that 3 of the 4 faucet barrels are square or rectangle-shaped instead of round. This prevents even the use of economical and easy to use hose clamp-type universal rubber adapters which are large enough to go over the entire barrel and were usually a great option of last resort.
I did go to the hardware store with all of my aerators and the fellow told me I would definitely have to swap the entire faucet to use my Python on any of them. He was very familiar with the Python too, and had a wonderful array of different adapters and whatnot for all kinds of faucets. As a matter of fact, he told me that it would only get worse as faucet manufacturers used more and more plastic rather than metal in their construction. He also believed that these manufacturers PURPOSELY made modern faucets incompatible with garden hose adapters (and therefore Pythons) as a liability measure due to concerns about the extra weight of these devices causing breakage resulting in water damage. As proof he told me that most of the large indoor faucet manufacturers would void your warranty for adapting a hose connection.
I'm a retired pipe tradesman with over 40 years of experience who has done his own plumbing for many decades, so I know this isn't just smoke and mirrors. I was very impressed with this fellow's intimate knowledge on the subject. And just to be sure, I went to 2 home centers on the way home and examined dozens of new faucets up close, and according to my estimate, about 80% of them would present at least some of the same problems to an aquarist with a Python.
In a nutshell, this stinks. I think this explanation from a liability standpoint probably explains nobody's willingness to address the problem, or even admit that a problem exists for that matter. Python didn't cause the problem, but it is Python's responsibility to find a solution. At the very least they should acknowledge the situation and start an education campaign so folks can go in with the understanding that they will most likely need to purchase new faucets. There is definitely a trend away from the "normal" faucets of yesterday that could usually be counted on to work with the few adapters Python does offer, and folks in the hobby need to know. If they don't do something now they might soon find themselves in a very different predicament.
I am not complaining about the otherwise fine product, only the company's lag in keeping things modern and transparent.
I now have aquariums on 2 levels of my home and am bailing much water with buckets while I decide if I really want to replace perfectly good, handsome and expensive faucets that are practically brand new.
Any thoughts?
I've had my Python for at least 25 years at 6 different addresses (It is obviously very durable and a great value. Thanks, Python!) and I've never had a problem until now. I have 4 indoor faucets at my current address - 1 kitchen and 3 bathrooms - and it will not adapt to ANY OF THEM. They are all very different models too. The kitchen has a telescoping spray wand that completely prevents any adapter of any kind. The bathrooms' aerators are 100% plastic; 2 of the 3 aerators are completely recessed; all 3, though completely different, are TINY and have unusual threads; and 2 have an O-ring seal around the perimeter instead of the trusted old flat rubber gasket at the base or tapered threads. Compounding things further is the fact that 3 of the 4 faucet barrels are square or rectangle-shaped instead of round. This prevents even the use of economical and easy to use hose clamp-type universal rubber adapters which are large enough to go over the entire barrel and were usually a great option of last resort.
I did go to the hardware store with all of my aerators and the fellow told me I would definitely have to swap the entire faucet to use my Python on any of them. He was very familiar with the Python too, and had a wonderful array of different adapters and whatnot for all kinds of faucets. As a matter of fact, he told me that it would only get worse as faucet manufacturers used more and more plastic rather than metal in their construction. He also believed that these manufacturers PURPOSELY made modern faucets incompatible with garden hose adapters (and therefore Pythons) as a liability measure due to concerns about the extra weight of these devices causing breakage resulting in water damage. As proof he told me that most of the large indoor faucet manufacturers would void your warranty for adapting a hose connection.
I'm a retired pipe tradesman with over 40 years of experience who has done his own plumbing for many decades, so I know this isn't just smoke and mirrors. I was very impressed with this fellow's intimate knowledge on the subject. And just to be sure, I went to 2 home centers on the way home and examined dozens of new faucets up close, and according to my estimate, about 80% of them would present at least some of the same problems to an aquarist with a Python.
In a nutshell, this stinks. I think this explanation from a liability standpoint probably explains nobody's willingness to address the problem, or even admit that a problem exists for that matter. Python didn't cause the problem, but it is Python's responsibility to find a solution. At the very least they should acknowledge the situation and start an education campaign so folks can go in with the understanding that they will most likely need to purchase new faucets. There is definitely a trend away from the "normal" faucets of yesterday that could usually be counted on to work with the few adapters Python does offer, and folks in the hobby need to know. If they don't do something now they might soon find themselves in a very different predicament.
I am not complaining about the otherwise fine product, only the company's lag in keeping things modern and transparent.
I now have aquariums on 2 levels of my home and am bailing much water with buckets while I decide if I really want to replace perfectly good, handsome and expensive faucets that are practically brand new.
Any thoughts?