Roman Eels In Jewelry

Discussion in 'Funny Stuff' started by Jellibeen, Mar 13, 2019.

  1. Jellibeen

    JellibeenWell Known MemberMember

    I am currently reading some historical fiction about Rome. they mentioned rich aristocrats keeping eels, and adoring them so much that some people were rumored to adorn their precious eels with golden jewelry. I looked this up and there are indeed historical accounts of people giving their fish jewelry. I thought this funny and interesting, so decided to share!

    Consul in 151 BC, Lucius Licinius Murena is said by Pliny to have invented fishponds (IX.170; Columella, VIII.16.5), his cognomen deriving from the murenae that he raised there. Although translated in the Loeb editions as "lampreys," Higginbotham understands the word to mean "eels," which does seem to be more appropriate. Gaius Hirrius, the first person to have ponds solely for raising eels, supplied six thousand to Caesar for his triumphal banquets and eventually sold his estate for four million sesterces (also Macrobius, III.15.9; Varro, III.17.3, who says that two thousand were provided). After the death of Lucullus, the same amount was paid just for the fish from his pond (Macrobius says forty thousand eels and Columella, four hundred thousand). The orator Quintus Hortensius, who lavished such care on his fishpond, is said to have wept when his favorite murena died. Another pet murena, kept there by Antonia, the niece of Augustus, was adorned with earrings, which prompted some to visit and witness the spectacle. (Here, an eel must be meant, given that the lamprey and moray have no pectoral fins on which to hang such ornaments.)

    Crassus, too, was said to have adorned a pet eel with earrings and small necklaces "just like some lovely maiden," training it to respond to its name and swimming up to eat what was offered. Rebuked by Domitius for weeping upon the death of the creature, he retorted that his accuser had buried three wives without shedding a tear (Aelian, VIII.4; Plutarch, De sollertia animalium, 976a; Macrobius, III.15.3). The praenomina are not given, and the Loeb translations footnote both Lucius and Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus. The other protagonist is identified as Marcus Licinius Crassus, who had defeated Spartacus in 73 BC and was a member of the Triumvirate in 60 BC.

    If the identification of Crassus is correct, Lucius Domitius must be meant, consul in 54 BC and the bitter rival of Crassus, who had him assaulted in the Forum (Plutarch, Crassus, XV.4). But if Gnaeus Domitius is intended (as Macrobius indicates), the father of Lucius and censor in 92 BC, then the Crassus of the story must be the orator Lucius Licinius Crassus, who shared the censorship that year. Such a rebuke would seem appropriate, Gnaeus Domitius calling Lucius Crassus a hypocrite as censor for weeping over the death of a pet eel, which was considered an expensive luxury item.​

  2. Seasoldier

    SeasoldierWell Known MemberMember

    I love history, you can learn something new every day, but those Romans were crazy weren't they?
  3. coralbandit

    coralbanditFishlore VIPMember

    And I thought I was carried away !
    In a world so weird today what is normal ? What the heck was normal then ?
    My fish are not wearing jewelry but my wife might think they get more of my attention .!
    I feel better [more normal now !] .