If you're main goal is saving CO2, then passive CO2 is better. If your goal is quickly getting your CO2 levels up to 30 ppm and keeping it there, a pressurized CO2 system using a diffuser or reactor is better.
It's been a while since I used a passive CO2 system. Still, I don't remember them doing such an amazing job. Personally, I'd rather set up a low tech system or a high tech one. I think the in-between approaches aren't worth the trouble.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
