bizaliz3
- #1
I'll start with my question and then move on to WHY I am asking this question.
I have proven through my own poor decisions as an early fish keeper, that a stunted fish is NOT permanently stunted. They are absolutely able to continue growing if moved to a larger environment.
But Does anyone know what the long term effects of stunting are, when the stunting has been REVERSED and the fish was allowed to grow to full size??? Will they go on to live a normal life span? Or did the early stunting possibly shorten its potential life span?
I am asking because of my Black ghost knife. He is at least 7 years old as I got him in December 2012 according to my camera roll. He is probably closer to 8 years old. Google tells me that the average life span of a BGK is roughly 10-15 years. So at 7-8...he shouldn't be nearing the end of his life...
BUT at the same time.....the lower end of the lifespan is 10. And he could be almost 8......so maybe getting close??
The problem is, he is suddenly behaving strangely and seems to have lost his appetite. (remembering he has been a healthy active fish in my care for 7 years) He is roughly 15-16 inches now. A nice big busty boy. His body is roughly 3-4 inches tall at its widest point!! But during the first couple years of his life...he lived in a 29 gallon. I hate admitting that, and I am aware it was not ok, so don't remind me. thanks!! But ya. As a result, he didn't really get much bigger than maybe 8 inches during his first 2 years. He then upgraded to a 55 gallon for a couple years and he put on a few more inches. Then he was upgraded to a 75 gallon where he has spent the last 3-4 years and has maxed out at around 15-16 inches.
So again....if a fish is stunted during the first few years of life, but then is allowed to grow into its average adult size later...will its life span have been shortened? Or does an overall slower growth rate in general equal shorter life span?
I guess what I am trying to figure out is if there is something really wrong with my BGK....or if he is simply reaching the end of his "natural" life? Cosmetically he looks perfect. He does not look sick in the least. I have not seen any poop to say whether or not he has healthy poop. He isn't coming out for his food and he is swimming strangely and just not acting like "himself". The angelfish and rummynoses and harlequin rasboras in the tank with him are perfectly fine.
In hindsight, he did spend his entire life at 80f...which is at the high end of his preferred temperature range.....which can also shorten life spans. But by how much????
I don't even know why I am posting this really. It will most likely just result in criticism. But I am basically just trying to decide if my BGK is reaching the end of his life span....or if I should try and see if there is something wrong that can be treated for. But I refuse to throw meds at a fish when there are no signs of illness other than behavior. And I don't really have an appropriate "hospital" tank for a 16 inch fish. :-(
One thing that is making it so extra sad is that I am going to be getting a 125 gallon in the very near future. Like possibly as soon as next week. But definitely within the next few months. So he was going to get a 6-footer :-(
Anyway, any input is appreciated. Just no criticism please. I don't need that right now. For what it's worth, I tried many times to find a person who would provide him a bigger tank than 75g. But I couldn't find a single person locally who has an extra large tank that is NOT already housing large aggressive fish!! Like literally! And my BGK is a puppy dog. I mean he won't even hurt a rummynose tetra for crying out loud. There were many inquiries over the years of people with 150 gallons and more...but their tank mates would not have worked with my BGK. So I came to the conclusion that I would give him the best life I could in the 75 and hope that one day I would be able to give him something even bigger. And now that I am close to being able to offer that to him with a 125g...it might be too late!! :-(
Thanks for reading.
I have proven through my own poor decisions as an early fish keeper, that a stunted fish is NOT permanently stunted. They are absolutely able to continue growing if moved to a larger environment.
But Does anyone know what the long term effects of stunting are, when the stunting has been REVERSED and the fish was allowed to grow to full size??? Will they go on to live a normal life span? Or did the early stunting possibly shorten its potential life span?
I am asking because of my Black ghost knife. He is at least 7 years old as I got him in December 2012 according to my camera roll. He is probably closer to 8 years old. Google tells me that the average life span of a BGK is roughly 10-15 years. So at 7-8...he shouldn't be nearing the end of his life...
BUT at the same time.....the lower end of the lifespan is 10. And he could be almost 8......so maybe getting close??
The problem is, he is suddenly behaving strangely and seems to have lost his appetite. (remembering he has been a healthy active fish in my care for 7 years) He is roughly 15-16 inches now. A nice big busty boy. His body is roughly 3-4 inches tall at its widest point!! But during the first couple years of his life...he lived in a 29 gallon. I hate admitting that, and I am aware it was not ok, so don't remind me. thanks!! But ya. As a result, he didn't really get much bigger than maybe 8 inches during his first 2 years. He then upgraded to a 55 gallon for a couple years and he put on a few more inches. Then he was upgraded to a 75 gallon where he has spent the last 3-4 years and has maxed out at around 15-16 inches.
So again....if a fish is stunted during the first few years of life, but then is allowed to grow into its average adult size later...will its life span have been shortened? Or does an overall slower growth rate in general equal shorter life span?
I guess what I am trying to figure out is if there is something really wrong with my BGK....or if he is simply reaching the end of his "natural" life? Cosmetically he looks perfect. He does not look sick in the least. I have not seen any poop to say whether or not he has healthy poop. He isn't coming out for his food and he is swimming strangely and just not acting like "himself". The angelfish and rummynoses and harlequin rasboras in the tank with him are perfectly fine.
In hindsight, he did spend his entire life at 80f...which is at the high end of his preferred temperature range.....which can also shorten life spans. But by how much????
I don't even know why I am posting this really. It will most likely just result in criticism. But I am basically just trying to decide if my BGK is reaching the end of his life span....or if I should try and see if there is something wrong that can be treated for. But I refuse to throw meds at a fish when there are no signs of illness other than behavior. And I don't really have an appropriate "hospital" tank for a 16 inch fish. :-(
One thing that is making it so extra sad is that I am going to be getting a 125 gallon in the very near future. Like possibly as soon as next week. But definitely within the next few months. So he was going to get a 6-footer :-(
Anyway, any input is appreciated. Just no criticism please. I don't need that right now. For what it's worth, I tried many times to find a person who would provide him a bigger tank than 75g. But I couldn't find a single person locally who has an extra large tank that is NOT already housing large aggressive fish!! Like literally! And my BGK is a puppy dog. I mean he won't even hurt a rummynose tetra for crying out loud. There were many inquiries over the years of people with 150 gallons and more...but their tank mates would not have worked with my BGK. So I came to the conclusion that I would give him the best life I could in the 75 and hope that one day I would be able to give him something even bigger. And now that I am close to being able to offer that to him with a 125g...it might be too late!! :-(
Thanks for reading.