sirdarksol
It would be best, although not absolutely necessary, for you to be listening to Emilie Autumn's version of “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” while reading this, as it is what I'm listening to as I write. A little bit of light-hearted harpsichord music does wonders for the mental faculties, just ask the residents of The Asylum... but I digress, already. ;D
[official moderator]Between little skirmishes in various threads, a thread meant to “disprove” the old school of thought, and a poll, it is obvious that there is a very large disagreement regarding whether or not it is safe to put bettas in community aquaria. This is nothing new. It's a discussion that has been happening on the forum since I first started here. It's a good thing that it's been brought up, although some of the methods that have been used on both sides of the discussion have been less than productive.
The point of this thread is to be productive. I want to see if we can come to a better understanding of what is best to suggest to others. All of us have to make the decision of whether or not to keep a betta in a community for ourselves, but that doesn't mean that we can't have a general consensus, or at least cordial disagreement, regarding how good of an idea this is.
First of all, we need to verify what is meant by “community.” I have always taken it to mean an aquarium that has a variety of fish swimming at all levels. I have <u>not</u> taken it to mean an aquarium with a betta (or other solitary fish) and a small cleaning crew of cories, otos, or bristle-nosed plecos. I certainly have never counted any inverts as creating a community tank. From looking at a variety of threads, this seems to be the most common interpretation, but we want to be absolutely sure that everyone is on the same page. If one person says, “Bettas do not belong in community tanks,” and means tanks that have other mid- and upper-level fish, and another person is thinking of bettas with cleaning crews and says “Yes they do,” the disagreement was created by misunderstanding, rather than by activity.
Second, we need to look at the fact that success is a subjective idea. Some people consider a fish living for a few months to be a success. Others consider a fish surviving a year or more to be a success. Some people consider it a success if their fish are active and colorful, despite longevity. Some people consider nothing less than an active fish that survives its expected lifetime to be a success. There are hundreds of other shades of “success,” as well. This is why a thread asking whether or not you've successfully kept a betta in a community tank has limited use.
I have no simple way around this. I can tell you that, in my opinion, success is not something that I can describe here. I base it on a broad range of experiences, both my own and others', and comparisons between not only life spans, but also activity level. My opinion is not law, though. This is one of the reasons that we all have to make this decision ourselves.
[/official moderator]
[my stance]
I am of the camp that believes that bettas don't do well in community aquaria. The areas that bettas live in are not conducive for the survival of most fish, so bettas aren't really built with a programmed set of responses to various types of fish. There seems to be something about other anabantoids that triggers their aggression response, but even that's not a guarantee. From the stories that I have heard over the past three+ years, it seems that chances are better than 50/50 that a betta in a community tank will be a problem. Those aren't odds that I want to play with, and I really don't want to suggest to others that they do so.
It seems that, over the past couple of years, most of the forum has adopted the same opinion. This doesn't make us right (see my thread about logic, discussion, and learning). I can assure you that this wasn't random. I went to the betta archives and searched for “community” and found, in the first two pages, almost two dozen examples of bettas having problems that appeared to be directly related to the fact that they were in a community tank. There were also a few cases of bettas taking exception to the presence of a bottom-feeder. There were also success stories, but much less frequent. I have also personally seen several bettas kept in community tanks, and all of them had problems.
The problems included:
Issues with guppies, mollies, platies, swordtails. Aggression going both ways on these.
Issues with many different kinds of tetras, including the diminutive neon tetras.
Issues with danios.
Issues with rainbows.
Issues with juvenile livebearers being kept in the betta's tank to grow up.
Issues with barbs (duh.)
Issues with gourami (double-duh.)
Betta outcompeting the other fish for food and becoming constipated.
Betta starving because of faster, more capable swimmers.
Betta continually attacking a pleco.
Betta attacking a cory
Bettas getting stressed and dying of illness for no apparent reason. This included a case of ich that didn't touch the rest of the tank.
These cases, and presumably many more like them (again, my search only included 100 threads), are the reason that many of us are of the opinion that a betta in a community aquarium is a risk that just isn't worth it.
Add to this the fact that three different members who kept dozens of bettas had stated that they noted a marked difference between the personality of bettas kept in community aquaria and those kept alone, and another such person who had made many attempts and said they caused “nothing but problems.”
There have definitely been cases where a betta has survived without violence or apparent stress in a community aquarium. The biggest problem, and the biggest reason that I will not suggest the route to anyone, is that I have not seen any commonality between these cases. It appears to be a matter of random chance. Worse, it seems that the slightest thing can set off a problem, and there's no way of telling what that occurrence will be.
Therefore, I suggest against bettas in communities, and I strongly suggest that people who decide to keep a betta in a community have a backup plan in case of explosion.
[/my stance]
[moderator]
Now, please, discuss. Keep it cordial. Keep it logical. Keep it productive.
[/moderator]
[official moderator]Between little skirmishes in various threads, a thread meant to “disprove” the old school of thought, and a poll, it is obvious that there is a very large disagreement regarding whether or not it is safe to put bettas in community aquaria. This is nothing new. It's a discussion that has been happening on the forum since I first started here. It's a good thing that it's been brought up, although some of the methods that have been used on both sides of the discussion have been less than productive.
The point of this thread is to be productive. I want to see if we can come to a better understanding of what is best to suggest to others. All of us have to make the decision of whether or not to keep a betta in a community for ourselves, but that doesn't mean that we can't have a general consensus, or at least cordial disagreement, regarding how good of an idea this is.
First of all, we need to verify what is meant by “community.” I have always taken it to mean an aquarium that has a variety of fish swimming at all levels. I have <u>not</u> taken it to mean an aquarium with a betta (or other solitary fish) and a small cleaning crew of cories, otos, or bristle-nosed plecos. I certainly have never counted any inverts as creating a community tank. From looking at a variety of threads, this seems to be the most common interpretation, but we want to be absolutely sure that everyone is on the same page. If one person says, “Bettas do not belong in community tanks,” and means tanks that have other mid- and upper-level fish, and another person is thinking of bettas with cleaning crews and says “Yes they do,” the disagreement was created by misunderstanding, rather than by activity.
Second, we need to look at the fact that success is a subjective idea. Some people consider a fish living for a few months to be a success. Others consider a fish surviving a year or more to be a success. Some people consider it a success if their fish are active and colorful, despite longevity. Some people consider nothing less than an active fish that survives its expected lifetime to be a success. There are hundreds of other shades of “success,” as well. This is why a thread asking whether or not you've successfully kept a betta in a community tank has limited use.
I have no simple way around this. I can tell you that, in my opinion, success is not something that I can describe here. I base it on a broad range of experiences, both my own and others', and comparisons between not only life spans, but also activity level. My opinion is not law, though. This is one of the reasons that we all have to make this decision ourselves.
[/official moderator]
[my stance]
I am of the camp that believes that bettas don't do well in community aquaria. The areas that bettas live in are not conducive for the survival of most fish, so bettas aren't really built with a programmed set of responses to various types of fish. There seems to be something about other anabantoids that triggers their aggression response, but even that's not a guarantee. From the stories that I have heard over the past three+ years, it seems that chances are better than 50/50 that a betta in a community tank will be a problem. Those aren't odds that I want to play with, and I really don't want to suggest to others that they do so.
It seems that, over the past couple of years, most of the forum has adopted the same opinion. This doesn't make us right (see my thread about logic, discussion, and learning). I can assure you that this wasn't random. I went to the betta archives and searched for “community” and found, in the first two pages, almost two dozen examples of bettas having problems that appeared to be directly related to the fact that they were in a community tank. There were also a few cases of bettas taking exception to the presence of a bottom-feeder. There were also success stories, but much less frequent. I have also personally seen several bettas kept in community tanks, and all of them had problems.
The problems included:
Issues with guppies, mollies, platies, swordtails. Aggression going both ways on these.
Issues with many different kinds of tetras, including the diminutive neon tetras.
Issues with danios.
Issues with rainbows.
Issues with juvenile livebearers being kept in the betta's tank to grow up.
Issues with barbs (duh.)
Issues with gourami (double-duh.)
Betta outcompeting the other fish for food and becoming constipated.
Betta starving because of faster, more capable swimmers.
Betta continually attacking a pleco.
Betta attacking a cory
Bettas getting stressed and dying of illness for no apparent reason. This included a case of ich that didn't touch the rest of the tank.
These cases, and presumably many more like them (again, my search only included 100 threads), are the reason that many of us are of the opinion that a betta in a community aquarium is a risk that just isn't worth it.
Add to this the fact that three different members who kept dozens of bettas had stated that they noted a marked difference between the personality of bettas kept in community aquaria and those kept alone, and another such person who had made many attempts and said they caused “nothing but problems.”
There have definitely been cases where a betta has survived without violence or apparent stress in a community aquarium. The biggest problem, and the biggest reason that I will not suggest the route to anyone, is that I have not seen any commonality between these cases. It appears to be a matter of random chance. Worse, it seems that the slightest thing can set off a problem, and there's no way of telling what that occurrence will be.
Therefore, I suggest against bettas in communities, and I strongly suggest that people who decide to keep a betta in a community have a backup plan in case of explosion.
[/my stance]
[moderator]
Now, please, discuss. Keep it cordial. Keep it logical. Keep it productive.
[/moderator]