|  |  |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| bettas in bowls Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanda A betta most definently cannot be kept in a bowl. | While I agree that it's not ideal, a betta most certainly can be kept in a bowl provided it's filtered or gets daily water changes, but that's a debate for another thread.
BTW, there is no mention to the size of this bowl. I'm assuming it's not a cereal bowl. Last edited by Jaysee; October 28th, 2009 at 12:47 PM.
|
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee While I agree that it's not ideal, a betta most certainly can be kept in a bowl provided it's filtered or gets daily water changes, but that's a debate for another thread.
BTW, there is no mention to the size of this bowl. I'm assuming it's not a cereal bowl. | If you even admit yourself that it's not "ideal" why even suggest it? |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| this thread has been moved as it has no bearing on the OP ...im sure there will be plenty of opinions on its own thread and no need to take up the other one |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Moderator
| |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanda If you even admit yourself that it's not "ideal" why even suggest it? | Because fish keeping is a hobby for people of all levels of interest.
You obviously abhor the idea indicating a much stricter perspecive of what is and is not "acceptable." That's good for you, but other people have other ideas of what is acceptable and until there are animal cruelty laws for fish, they can have those differing views. |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| seeing how animal cruelty laws for fish are probably not going to happen anytime soon, its our job to help these poor living creatures when they cant run away and speak for themselves....it doesnt make it right or even acceptable that the lack of laws for them, means mistreating them is ok...IMO fish are no different than a dog, horse, cat or any other animal that there are laws for... |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee While I agree that it's not ideal, a betta most certainly can be kept in a bowl provided it's filtered or gets daily water changes....
...assuming it's not a cereal bowl. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanda If you admit that it's not "ideal" why even suggest it? | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee Because fish keeping is a hobby for people of all levels of interest.
You obviously abhor the idea indicating a much stricter perspecive of what is and is not "acceptable." That's good for you, but other people have other ideas of what is acceptable and until there are animal cruelty laws for fish, they can have those differing views. | True they can have those differing views and that's what life and hobbies are all about. And you're also right, there are no animal cruelty laws for fish. It's a matter for each person to govern themselves. What I like best about fishlore is that it allows a chance to read other peoples views and compare them to your own to understand they're perspective on it. First: What is a "bowl"?
Is it an unfiltered container? Is it deep? Shallow? How large is it? Second: What is the level of care?
Are there daily water-changes? How often is the tank cleaned? How often is it topped up? How often is the fish fed? Third: What about the fish?
Is they're health status monitored? What's the standard for health? Fourth: What are your standards?
Do you look at behavioral needs? Size requirements?
So to be fair what's my perspective? First: A bowl is a small container of less then 1 L of water that is unfiltered and kept below the ideal temperature requirements of the fish. The shape of the bowl is a factor with a preference to having a large surface area (wide container) increases gas exchange vs a small surface area (narrow container) which has much less gas exchange. Second: If the water is changes daily then the ammonia toxicity effects are largely decreased. If the "bowl" is cleaned frequently then ammonia produced by excess food and feces is taken care of as well. Is the water allowed to evaporate excessively between water changes or is the water level maintained. This is involved with water changes as well but since only the water and not the ammonia evaporates then decreasing water levels increases the concentration of ammonia. Increased feeding allows for increased ammonia production through uneaten food and waste production. Third: Does the health of the fish deteriorate as time moves on? Do they maintain attitude and activity? Are the fins in good health with full length and spread or are they deteriorating and poor? If anyone of these isn't met (fins are deteriorating, negative behavioural changes, etc.) than in my opinion something isn't working and steps should be taken to correct them starting with determining if envriomental factors are the issue before pulling out the medications. Fourth: My standards? Since I have a farm background my standards are based on what I know. I look at the 5 freedoms that every farm animal is given: 1. Freedom from Hunger and Thirst - by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour. 2. Freedom from Discomfort - by providing an appropriate environment including shelter and a comfortable resting area. 3. Freedom from Pain, Injury or Disease - by prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment. 4. Freedom to Express Normal Behaviour - by providing sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the animal's own kind. 5. Freedom from Fear and Distress - by ensuring conditions and treatment which avoid mental suffering.
If these are the promise I keep to animals that I have no emotional attachment to. If cows can be promised these, then shouldn't a pet at least have this? Fish pose a special challenge because they're so different, and betta's in particular because of the behavioral traits we've bred into them over the course of domestication.
Those are my standards.
Now I'm curious, what are everyone elses'? |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Moderator
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Red1313 True they can have those differing views and that's what life and hobbies are all about. And you're also right, there are no animal cruelty laws for fish. It's a matter for each person to govern themselves. What I like best about fishlore is that it allows a chance to read other peoples views and compare them to your own to understand they're perspective on it. First: What is a "bowl"?
Is it an unfiltered container? Is it deep? Shallow? How large is it? Second: What is the level of care?
Are there daily water-changes? How often is the tank cleaned? How often is it topped up? How often is the fish fed? Third: What about the fish?
Is they're health status monitored? What's the standard for health? Fourth: What are your standards?
Do you look at behavioral needs? Size requirements?
So to be fair what's my perspective? First: A bowl is a small container of less then 1 L of water that is unfiltered and kept below the ideal temperature requirements of the fish. The shape of the bowl is a factor with a preference to having a large surface area (wide container) increases gas exchange vs a small surface area (narrow container) which has much less gas exchange. Second: If the water is changes daily then the ammonia toxicity effects are largely decreased. If the "bowl" is cleaned frequently then ammonia produced by excess food and feces is taken care of as well. Is the water allowed to evaporate excessively between water changes or is the water level maintained. This is involved with water changes as well but since only the water and not the ammonia evaporates then decreasing water levels increases the concentration of ammonia. Increased feeding allows for increased ammonia production through uneaten food and waste production. Third: Does the health of the fish deteriorate as time moves on? Do they maintain attitude and activity? Are the fins in good health with full length and spread or are they deteriorating and poor? If anyone of these isn't met (fins are deteriorating, negative behavioural changes, etc.) than in my opinion something isn't working and steps should be taken to correct them starting with determining if envriomental factors are the issue before pulling out the medications. Fourth: My standards? Since I have a farm background my standards are based on what I know. I look at the 5 freedoms that every farm animal is given: 1. Freedom from Hunger and Thirst - by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour. 2. Freedom from Discomfort - by providing an appropriate environment including shelter and a comfortable resting area. 3. Freedom from Pain, Injury or Disease - by prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment. 4. Freedom to Express Normal Behaviour - by providing sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the animal's own kind. 5. Freedom from Fear and Distress - by ensuring conditions and treatment which avoid mental suffering.
If these are the promise I keep to animals that I have no emotional attachment to. If cows can be promised these, then shouldn't a pet at least have this? Fish pose a special challenge because they're so different, and betta's in particular because of the behavioral traits we've bred into them over the course of domestication.
Those are my standards.
Now I'm curious, what are everyone elses'? | Wow, I really like the way you stated all of that. It's a great list to review when we're deciding what's best for all of our animals  |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| very good write up red! 
I know i used o keep bettas in bowls before i knew better. Their overall health was bad. |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Fish Mentor
| Impressive, Red
Very well stated..........  |
| |
October 28th, 2009
|
| | Moderator
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee Because fish keeping is a hobby for people of all levels of interest.
You obviously abhor the idea indicating a much stricter perspecive of what is and is not "acceptable." That's good for you, but other people have other ideas of what is acceptable and until there are animal cruelty laws for fish, they can have those differing views. | Legally, you are correct. There are numerous amoral actions that may be taken that are legal. Their legality makes them no less amoral.
Morals are standards that have nothing to do with law; they have to do with what is right and what is wrong.
Ethics have to do with societal opinions of right and wrong. In general, anything that is unethical is also immoral, but this isn't necessarily true the other way around.
Laws are the things that a country legislates and may or may not have anything to do with morals and ethics.
As human beings, we always have a choice of whether we wish to act illegally or legally, unethically or ethically, immorally or morally. These three sets of dichotomies overlap with each other. There are cases where one can act morally but illegally (for example; kidnapping an abused dog and sending it to a home where it will be better treated. This is an illegal act, but is morally just). There are cases where a person may act legally but unethically or immorally (for example; defense lawyers around the country using legal loopholes to protect clients that they know are guilty.) |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Keeper
| People who love and care about their bettas want them to be happy.
A point about keeping them in bowls that is less known is that the shape of the bowl causes the fighter fish to be able to see its own reflection. Hence the fish spends its whole life fighting with and chasing its own reflection. Keeping them in bowls is not ideal nor is it kind. They all deserve, space and an ideal home! |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Red1313 True they can have those differing views and that's what life and hobbies are all about. And you're also right, there are no animal cruelty laws for fish. It's a matter for each person to govern themselves. What I like best about fishlore is that it allows a chance to read other peoples views and compare them to your own to understand they're perspective on it. First: What is a "bowl"?
Is it an unfiltered container? Is it deep? Shallow? How large is it? Second: What is the level of care?
Are there daily water-changes? How often is the tank cleaned? How often is it topped up? How often is the fish fed? Third: What about the fish?
Is they're health status monitored? What's the standard for health? Fourth: What are your standards?
Do you look at behavioral needs? Size requirements?
So to be fair what's my perspective? First: A bowl is a small container of less then 1 L of water that is unfiltered and kept below the ideal temperature requirements of the fish. The shape of the bowl is a factor with a preference to having a large surface area (wide container) increases gas exchange vs a small surface area (narrow container) which has much less gas exchange. Second: If the water is changes daily then the ammonia toxicity effects are largely decreased. If the "bowl" is cleaned frequently then ammonia produced by excess food and feces is taken care of as well. Is the water allowed to evaporate excessively between water changes or is the water level maintained. This is involved with water changes as well but since only the water and not the ammonia evaporates then decreasing water levels increases the concentration of ammonia. Increased feeding allows for increased ammonia production through uneaten food and waste production. Third: Does the health of the fish deteriorate as time moves on? Do they maintain attitude and activity? Are the fins in good health with full length and spread or are they deteriorating and poor? If anyone of these isn't met (fins are deteriorating, negative behavioural changes, etc.) than in my opinion something isn't working and steps should be taken to correct them starting with determining if envriomental factors are the issue before pulling out the medications. Fourth: My standards? Since I have a farm background my standards are based on what I know. I look at the 5 freedoms that every farm animal is given: 1. Freedom from Hunger and Thirst - by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour. 2. Freedom from Discomfort - by providing an appropriate environment including shelter and a comfortable resting area. 3. Freedom from Pain, Injury or Disease - by prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment. 4. Freedom to Express Normal Behaviour - by providing sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the animal's own kind. 5. Freedom from Fear and Distress - by ensuring conditions and treatment which avoid mental suffering.
If these are the promise I keep to animals that I have no emotional attachment to. If cows can be promised these, then shouldn't a pet at least have this? Fish pose a special challenge because they're so different, and betta's in particular because of the behavioral traits we've bred into them over the course of domestication.
Those are my standards.
Now I'm curious, what are everyone elses'? | Very well said my friend  |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Bum
| Last edited by Da_Crinkly; October 29th, 2009 at 08:12 AM.
|
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| I think red1313 has it right, asking what size the bowl is - which is what I eluded to. A bowl of propper size with filtration (and heater if needed) is a perfectly fine home for a betta. So isn't that what the debate ought to be about? Minimum size?
Laws don't govern people - people govern laws and they are a reflection of what society deems important and morals are specific to groups of likeminded individuals. So yes, they don't have to overlap. But you can't get mad at people who have a different set of morals that don't interfere with societal norms. They have that right. |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Keeper
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Crinkly ... We had planned to go shopping for stuff for the fish tank tomorrow (Friday) but came down with swine flu so are stuck at home trying not to breathe on anyone or pass it around. | Take care of yourself and feel better!
I think betta's can be in bowls as long as it has the right equipment and size. |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Jaysee. I understand your point but the fact of the matter is this a community who LOVES fish and cares about them and for them. I personally don't care about what laws are in place and what laws are not in place. How many people do you know have a heater and a filter stuck on the side of a bowl with a betta in it?. I personally have never seen even 1. People put betta's in tiny bowls with NO heat and NO filtration because that's how pet stores and vast amount of people are being told to care for them and it has become a standard in betta care. Not to pick on Da_Crinkly (they are trying to better the situation) but look at how tiny of a bowl that betta is in. That is the norm that is what we see on fishlore ALL the time. I honestly don't care about a persons right to be able to keep a creature in less then ideal situation. It's there right yeah but it's my right to say "Nope that's not ok". I mean I could live in a cold nasty closet with a toilet too but I wouldn't thrive and I wouldn't be happy. That what a bowl is. A small cold closet with a toilet. If I were in a situation like that I sure would hope someone with some morals would stand up and say "Um, do you think you ought to be keeping that girl in the closet, it just doesn't seem right?"..lol.. Since this is a fish community, I think it would be odd if we condoned anything less then perfect conditions for our fish, dont you? Last edited by CHoffman; October 29th, 2009 at 04:48 PM.
|
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Moderator
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee I think red1313 has it right, asking what size the bowl is - which is what I eluded to. A bowl of propper size with filtration (and heater if needed) is a perfectly fine home for a betta. So isn't that what the debate ought to be about? Minimum size? | This is an argument of semantics.
I would guess that if you asked the folks around here what they thought of when they heard "fishbowl," they would say "small aquarium, less than 1g, can't be effectively heated or filtered" or something similar.
Most of us don't think of a five gallon bowl with a sound filter and a decent heater when we hear "fishbowl." I'd consider that a small BiOrb. |
| |
October 29th, 2009
|
| | Fish Keeper
| Just a question to pose to you all. I think often with people who keep their betta in a bowl it is not a case of neglect or not caring (if the bowl is of decent size).
I think a question that comes into the equation is cost. A proper tank with filter, heater etc is very costly. Especially when a male betta ideally would like to be kept on his own.
If a person WHO DOES NOT HAVE enough finances to keep a betta in a huge tank sees fighters in neglect in a pet store, kept in a tiny cordial cups with green slime in the bottom, rescues them, takes them home and puts them in a bowl, with enough swimming space and with a lamp on the bowl for heat, is this person really doing a bad thing by the betta?
Lets face the facts, the betta fish are not widely cared about although they should be.
Often the case of male bettas is that they are forced to fight each other to the bitter death. Often they go and die neglected in cordial cups still on the shelf for not being pretty enough for fickle people to buy. Often they are bought by ignorant people who put them in together and walk away and wonder why one or both end up dead.
When this is the state of the world for fighters can a person who does their best buy them, depending on their financial situation really be condemmed?
Are you going to say that this person has no right to buy the fighters, when the fighters future is most likely 100% more bleak for the financially challenged person not buying them?
What is your opinions? |
| |
October 30th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CHoffman If I were in a situation like that I sure would hope someone with some morals would stand up and say "Um, do you think you ought to be keeping that girl in the closet, it just doesn't seem right?" | Uhhh, that goes on everyday with HUMANS all around the world. It's a tragedy...a REAL tragedy. The comparison of a fish in substandard conditions to a human in substandard conditions makes me throw up in my mouth, to be frank. Fish are not people, and with real injustices to people occuring on a daily basis, it's flat out disgusting.
I'm not trying to get anyone to agree with me, and I don't expect any of you to understand where I am coming from. The fact is, I've mistreated and killed more fish than all of you combined will ever keep in your lives. Working on a fishing boat, I've killed thousands. So excuse me if I don't share your sympathy for a suffering fish, as I've been desensitized to it being elbow deep in dead and dying fish day in and day out.
That doesn't mean I don't care about my fish, but I certainly don't think twice about destroying one if need be. The way I see it, the fish are there for me, not the other way around. My fish live in my tanks for my enjoyment and pleasure. Now, if I want to maximize my enjoyment (and who doesn't?), it behooths me to provide my fish with the best possible living conditions...which I do.
Sirdarksol - that's why I put a clarifier in there about the bowl being of more significant size (not a cereal bowl) and filtered. Obviously that was overlooked in the frenzy.
Fishtroy - Fishkeeping is an expensive hobby and it's up to the keepers to stay within their means. If they cannot afford a propper set up then they shouldn't keep fish. Last edited by Jaysee; October 30th, 2009 at 01:13 AM.
|
| |
October 30th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysee Fishtroy - Fishkeeping is an expensive hobby and it's up to the keepers to stay within their means. If they cannot afford a propper set up then they shouldn't keep fish. |
agreed. |
| |
October 30th, 2009
|
| | Fish Master
| See,that's where you & I differ Jaysee.
I do not believe that animals were put on this earth for me to kill & do with them as I please. I have many animals, and I treat them as I would any human. I don't eat meat or fish - they're not something to be tortured & slaughtered.
IMO, as a human we should be able to take better care of the animals we take responsibility for. If you can't afford the tank - DON'T GET THE FISH. If you can't afford a vet - don't get an animal. Simple as that. It's a life & a responsibility. |
| |
October 30th, 2009
|
| | Moderator
| This topic has been debated before. Not only here but on countless forums and real life.
Many good points have been made in this threads.
Anything else would be repetitious.
Since we no longer have a Hot Topics forum, there's no place on FL to debate commercial fishing vs vegan principles.
I'm closing this thread before it gets out of hand. |
| |  | |